Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Varying pleasant activities is conducive to well-being. — Carmelics
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Varying pleasant activities is conducive to well-being.

    Virtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Awareness of one's stable natural state's unimpeded life activity must be maintained.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Varying the expression of life activity is needed to maintain that awareness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Aristotle holds that eudaimonia requires the stable, consistent exercise of virtuous activity, not novel variation in pleasant pursuits.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Habituation (ethos) builds character through repetition, meaning variety in activity undermines the deep dispositional excellence central to well-being.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The Stoics argue that well-being (eudaimonia) depends entirely on rational virtue, rendering variation in externally pleasant activities irrelevant to its achievement.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Treating varied pleasant activities as conducive to well-being conflates preferred indifferents (proēgmena adiaphora) with genuine goods, a category error Epictetus explicitly warns against.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Virtue Ethics

    Related

    Aristotle holds that eudaimonia requires the stable, consistent exercise of virt...Awareness of one's stable natural state's unimpeded life activity must be mainta...Habituation (ethos) builds character through repetition, meaning variety in acti...The Stoics argue that well-being (eudaimonia) depends entirely on rational virtu...
    +2 moreShow less
    Treating varied pleasant activities as conducive to well-being conflates preferr...Varying the expression of life activity is needed to maintain that awareness.

    Similar

    Intellectual activities are intrinsically good.82%Beyond the knowledge of certain things, specific activities are requir...80%A happy life must include pleasure80%The notion of well-being has practical relevance in human thinking.80%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: pleasure
    View source passageHide passage
    Epicurus took a less elitist and less intellectualist view of pleasure according to which it is available to its greatest extent to any animal free from bodily and emotional pain (Cooper 1999a), with no highly developed distinctively human capacity or functioning in principle required. Epicureans cultivated philosophy, however, to free people from groundless fears of afterlife suffering and death, and inculcated habits of living enabling one to live simply and thus securely because not needing,
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit