Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Varying pleasant activities is conducive to well-being.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Aristotle holds that eudaimonia requires the stable, consistent exercise of virtuous activity, not novel variation in pleasant pursuits.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Habituation (ethos) builds character through repetition, meaning variety in activity undermines the deep dispositional excellence central to well-being.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The Stoics argue that well-being (eudaimonia) depends entirely on rational virtue, rendering variation in externally pleasant activities irrelevant to its achievement.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Treating varied pleasant activities as conducive to well-being conflates preferred indifferents (proēgmena adiaphora) with genuine goods, a category error Epictetus explicitly warns against.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Awareness of one's stable natural state's unimpeded life activity must be maintained.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Varying the expression of life activity is needed to maintain that awareness.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.