Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Without a credible grounding for these counterfactuals, t... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→All attempts to save meaningful contingency governed by human free will are doomed to failure

    Without a credible grounding for these counterfactuals, the apparatus of middle knowledge collapses into either Calvinist hard determinism or an unconstrained libertarianism incompatible with God's providential sovereignty.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Calvinist Hard Determinism(as used in theology and philosophy of free will)
    The belief (associated with John Calvin and some philosophers) that everything that happens is completely predetermined by God, meaning humans don't have genuine free will—we only think we're choosing.
    God's Providential Sovereignty(as used in theology and philosophy of religion)
    The theological claim that God is all-powerful, all-knowing, and in complete control of everything that happens in the universe while also having a plan or purpose for creation.
    Libertarianism(as used in philosophy of free will)
    The philosophical view that humans have genuine free will—our choices aren't determined by prior causes and we're truly responsible for what we do. (Note: this is different from the political meaning of 'libertarianism.')
    Middle knowledge(Core component of Molinism, as described in Marsh's reply to Maitzen)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    God's knowledge of what free creatures would freely do in counterfactual situations
    counterfactuals(as used in logic and philosophy of free will (related to 'subjunctives of freedom'))
    Statements about what *would* happen in situations that aren't actually happening—'if I had studied harder, I would have passed the test' is a counterfactual about a situation that didn't occur.
    grounding(Drawn from contemporary metaphysics; proposed as potentially applicable to understanding the foundations of legality.)
    A metaphysical relation in which some entities or facts are more foundational than others, providing a hierarchical structure of the world.
    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1 linked

    Related

    All attempts to save meaningful contingency governed by human free will are doom...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective