Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Yet the agent in this scenario is wholly rational — there... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The Simple View is false.

    Yet the agent in this scenario is wholly rational — there is no irrationality in the agent's endeavor.

    Moral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral Responsibility

    Connections

    2 topics

    Philosophy of Language2 linkedFree Will & Foreknowledge

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    1 linked

    Related

    An agent can want either to φ or to Θ without preferring one over the other, and...By the Simple View, if the agent φ's intentionally, the agent intended to φ; and...If the agent succeeds in φing through skill and not accident, then the agent φ's...It is irrational to intend to φ and intend to Θ while believing it is flatly imp...
    +3 moreShow less
    Such an agent can rationally try to φ and try to Θ concurrently as a strategy to...The Simple View generates a contradiction: it attributes an irrational pair of i...The Simple View is false.

    Similar

    The agent in Bratman's case is stipulated to be wholly rational.88%Some reasons exist precisely because an agent is not fully rational.83%By conforming to the categorical and hypothetical imperatives, a ratio...83%The Categorical Imperative presumes that rational agents can conform t...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: action
    View source passageHide passage
    The simplest version of such an account depends on what Michael Bratman has dubbed “the Simple View.” This is the thesis that proposition (6) above, [The agent G'd intentionally] and, correspondingly, proposition (7) [The agent Fed with the intention of Ging] entail that, at the time of action, the agent intended to G. Surely, from the causalist point of view, the most natural account of Ging intentionally is that the action of Ging is governed by a present directed intention whose content for t

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective