Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Antonin Scalia — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Antonin Scalia
    Antonin Scalia

    Antonin Scalia

    contemporaryLegal Originalism / Textualism

    1936 – 2016

    Antonin Scalia (1936–2016) was an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, appointed by President Reagan in 1986 and serving until his death. He is best known as the foremost champion of originalism and textualism in American constitutional and statutory interpretation, arguing that legal texts must be understood according to their original public meaning rather than evolving judicial construction or legislative intent. His prolific opinions and academic writings made him one of the most intellectually influential jurists of the twentieth century.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed and systematized original public meaning originalism as a rigorous judicial methodology

    2

    Championed textualism in statutory interpretation, rejecting use of legislative history

    3

    Authored landmark opinions including District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), affirming individual Second Amendment rights

    4

    Wrote 'A Matter of Interpretation' (1997), the definitive statement of his judicial philosophy

    5

    Shaped contemporary constitutional theory through influential concurrences and dissents spanning three decades

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Rights & Liberty

    claim

    An interpretive theory that appeals to the abstract intentions of constitutional authors over their concrete historical understandings may not qualify as genuine originalism and may instead collapse into living constitutionalism.

    Democracy & Governance

    claim

    An interpretive theory that appeals to the abstract intentions of constitutional authors over their concrete historical understandings may not qualify as genuine originalism and may instead collapse into living constitutionalism.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Legal Originalism / Textualism

    Topic Influence

    Democracy & Governance1
    Rights & Liberty1

    Related Thinkers

    John Stuart Mill2 sharedEdward Blyden2 sharedJames T. Holly2 sharedJoseph Raz2 sharedMartha Nussbaum2 sharedMartin Delany2 sharedDavid Miller2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Democracy & Governance→See Rights & Liberty→