Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Joseph Raz — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Joseph Raz
    Joseph Raz

    Joseph Raz

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy, Legal Positivism

    1939 – 2022

    Joseph Raz (1939–2022) was an Israeli legal and moral philosopher, widely regarded as one of the most influential legal positivists and political philosophers of the twentieth century. He taught at Oxford, Columbia, and King's College London, making foundational contributions to the theory of authority, practical reason, and the nature of law. His work bridges legal philosophy, ethics, and political theory with exceptional analytical rigor.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed the service conception of authority, arguing authority is legitimate when it helps subjects better conform to reasons that already apply to them

    2

    Advanced exclusive legal positivism, holding that law's validity never depends on moral criteria

    3

    Articulated an interest-based (will-independent) theory of rights grounded in protected individual interests

    4

    Developed a pluralist account of practical reason and incommensurability of values in 'The Morality of Freedom' (1986)

    5

    Contributed foundational work on the nature of norms and their role in practical reasoning in 'Practical Reason and Norms' (1975)

    Positions & Arguments(4)

    Philosophy of Language

    claim

    We have gone astray in our understanding of how rules operate if we accept that interpretation is fundamental to meaning

    Rights & Liberty

    claim

    An interpretive theory that appeals to the abstract intentions of constitutional authors over their concrete historical understandings may not qualify as genuine originalism and may instead collapse into living constitutionalism.

    claim

    The concept of a right emerged simultaneously with reflective awareness of social norms, not at any later historically traceable point.

    Democracy & Governance

    claim

    An interpretive theory that appeals to the abstract intentions of constitutional authors over their concrete historical understandings may not qualify as genuine originalism and may instead collapse into living constitutionalism.

    claim

    The account of legitimate authority as a justification right is not undermined by the autonomy-based objection to authority.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    4

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy, Legal Positivism

    Topic Influence

    Democracy & Governance2
    Rights & Liberty2
    Philosophy of Language1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant3 sharedThomas Hobbes3 sharedLudwig Wittgenstein2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedJohn Stuart Mill2 sharedPlato2 sharedRené Descartes2 sharedAnderson2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Democracy & Governance→See Rights & Liberty→