Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Bishop Hoadly — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Bishop Hoadly
    Bishop Hoadly

    Bishop Hoadly

    modernLatitudinarianism

    1676 – 1761

    Benjamin Hoadly (1676–1761) was an English Latitudinarian bishop and controversialist who argued against the coercive authority of any visible church, insisting that Christ's kingdom is purely spiritual and that religious authority resides in individual conscience guided by Scripture. His 1717 sermon 'The Nature of the Kingdom or Church of Christ' ignited the Bangorian Controversy, one of the most significant ecclesiastical disputes of 18th-century England. He applied similar interpretive principles to religious and civil authority alike, anticipating later intentionalist theories of textual and constitutional interpretation.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Sparked the Bangorian Controversy (1717) by denying the authority of any visible church to judge matters of faith

    2

    Argued that religious authority rests solely in Scripture as interpreted by individual conscience

    3

    Advanced an intentionalist hermeneutic holding that interpretation must recover the original author's meaning

    4

    Defended Whig political principles and religious toleration against High Church opponents

    5

    Served successively as Bishop of Bangor, Hereford, Salisbury, and Winchester

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Rights & Liberty

    claim

    An interpretive theory that appeals to the abstract intentions of constitutional authors over their concrete historical understandings may not qualify as genuine originalism and may instead collapse into living constitutionalism.

    Democracy & Governance

    claim

    An interpretive theory that appeals to the abstract intentions of constitutional authors over their concrete historical understandings may not qualify as genuine originalism and may instead collapse into living constitutionalism.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    modern

    Tradition

    Latitudinarianism

    Topic Influence

    Democracy & Governance1
    Rights & Liberty1

    Related Thinkers

    John Stuart Mill2 sharedEdward Blyden2 sharedJames T. Holly2 sharedJoseph Raz2 sharedMartha Nussbaum2 sharedMartin Delany2 sharedDavid Miller2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Democracy & Governance→See Rights & Liberty→