Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Brooks — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Brooks
    B

    Brooks

    contemporaryAnalytic Ethics

    Brooks is a contemporary philosopher working in moral philosophy, with attention to the ethics of deception and the conditions under which wrongs are morally evaluated. Their work engages questions about culpability, intention, and the moral significance of deliberate versus inadvertent harmful acts.

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Argued for the morally distinct and aggravated character of deception relative to unintentional wrongs

    2

    Contributed to contemporary debates on culpability and the ethics of lying

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Moral Responsibility

    claim

    Deception has a different and more serious character than unintentional wrongs.

    Justice & Punishment

    claim

    Deception has a different and more serious character than unintentional wrongs.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Ethics

    Topic Influence

    Justice & Punishment1
    Moral Responsibility1

    Related Thinkers

    Jackson2 shared
    Pargetter
    2 shared
    Goldman2 shared
    Portmore2 shared
    David Hume2 shared
    Immanuel Kant2 shared
    John Stuart Mill2 shared
    Martha Nussbaum2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Justice & Punishment→See Moral Responsibility→