Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Goldman — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Goldman
    G

    Goldman

    contemporaryAnalytic Ethics

    b. 1942

    Holly M. Smith (publishing earlier as Holly Smith Goldman) is an American moral philosopher known for her influential work on the theory of moral obligation, particularly the debate between actualism and possibilism. Her paper 'Doing the Best One Can' (1978) is a landmark contribution to the analysis of obligation under conditions of predicted moral failure.

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed influential critiques of actualist principles of obligation in 'Doing the Best One Can'

    2

    Advanced the possibilism vs. actualism debate in normative ethics

    3

    Contributed major work on the ethics of uncertainty and moral ignorance

    4

    Published 'Making Morality Work' (2018) on the problem of usable moral theory

    5

    Long-tenured professor of philosophy at Rutgers University

    Positions & Arguments(5)

    Moral Responsibility

    claim

    Doug is not obligated at 2 pm to eat a healthy meal at 6 pm

    premise

    Principle (G) generates jointly unfulfillable obligations when an act sequence Ai satisfies (G)'s conditions but a counterfactual holds such that performing the first half of Ai would cause the agent not to perform the second half.

    premise

    The sequence of acts following the first half of Ai would be worse than the sequence following an alternative to the first half of Ai.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    5

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Ethics

    Topic Influence

    Moral Responsibility5
    Consequentialism4
    Justice & Punishment1

    Related Thinkers

    premise

    A principle that generates jointly unfulfillable obligations at the same time cannot be a sound principle of obligation.

    claim

    Principle (G) is defective as a general principle of actualist obligation.

    Justice & Punishment

    claim

    Doug is not obligated at 2 pm to eat a healthy meal at 6 pm

    Consequentialism

    premise

    Principle (G) generates jointly unfulfillable obligations when an act sequence Ai satisfies (G)'s conditions but a counterfactual holds such that performing the first half of Ai would cause the agent not to perform the second half.

    premise

    The sequence of acts following the first half of Ai would be worse than the sequence following an alternative to the first half of Ai.

    premise

    A principle that generates jointly unfulfillable obligations at the same time cannot be a sound principle of obligation.

    claim

    Principle (G) is defective as a general principle of actualist obligation.

    Jackson
    3 shared
    Pargetter3 shared
    Brian Skyrms2 shared
    Patrick Maher2 shared
    Portmore2 shared
    David Hume2 shared
    Immanuel Kant2 shared
    John Stuart Mill2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Moral Responsibility→See Consequentialism→