Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    D.M. Armstrong — Carmelics
    Thinkers/D.M. Armstrong
    D.M. Armstrong

    D.M. Armstrong

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy, Naturalism

    1926 – 2014

    David Malet Armstrong (1926–2014) was an Australian analytic philosopher and Emeritus Professor at the University of Sydney, widely regarded as one of the most significant metaphysicians of the twentieth century. He is best known for defending naturalism across multiple domains, developing an immanent realist theory of universals, and his influential contributions to philosophy of mind, laws of nature, and truthmaker theory.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed immanent realism about universals, arguing universals are instantiated in space-time rather than abstract realms

    2

    Defended a functionalist materialist theory of mind in A Materialist Theory of the Mind (1968)

    3

    Advanced a necessitarian account of laws of nature as relations between universals

    4

    Contributed foundational work to truthmaker theory, grounding truth in worldly states of affairs

    5

    Developed a combinatorial theory of possibility, constructing modality from actual particulars and universals

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    The lack of informativeness is not a good objection to the optimalist account of negative truths

    claim

    We must distinguish between the radical empiricist's meaning of 'meaning' (epistemic reduction) and a more common-sensical meaning of 'meaning' (factual reference).

    Philosophy of Language

    claim

    We must distinguish between the radical empiricist's meaning of 'meaning' (epistemic reduction) and a more common-sensical meaning of 'meaning' (factual reference).

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy, Naturalism

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge2
    Philosophy of Language1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant2 sharedDavid Lewis2 sharedBertrand Russell2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedStathis Psillos2 sharedAristotle2 sharedBas van Fraassen2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Philosophy of Language→