Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    David Armstrong — Carmelics
    Thinkers/David Armstrong
    David Armstrong

    David Armstrong

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy (Australian Realism)

    1926 – 2014

    David Malet Armstrong (1926-2014) was an Australian philosopher known for his systematic defense of scientific realism and a naturalistic, physicalist metaphysics. He made influential contributions to the theory of universals, the philosophy of mind, and the metaphysics of laws of nature, arguing for a posteriori realism about universals grounded in empirical science.

    WWikipediaIEPInternet Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed a theory of universals as immanent, a posteriori entities grounded in science

    2

    Defended the central-state identity theory of mind, identifying mental states with brain states

    3

    Formulated the Dretske-Tooley-Armstrong account of laws of nature as relations between universals

    4

    Authored the influential two-volume 'Universals and Scientific Realism' (1978)

    5

    Advanced a truthmaker theory of truth in 'Truth and Truthmakers' (2004)

    Positions & Arguments(3)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    By analogy, simply positing relational tropes does not provide an effective theoretical response to Bradley's argument

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    By analogy, simply positing relational tropes does not provide an effective theoretical response to Bradley's argument

    claim

    The lack of informativeness is not a good objection to the optimalist account of negative truths

    Consciousness & Mind

    claim

    Lowe's solution to Bradley's regress merely replaces one equally thorny problem with another

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    3

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy (Australian Realism)

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge2
    Consciousness & Mind1
    Modality & Possibility1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant3 sharedDavid Lewis3 sharedAristotle3 sharedPlato3 sharedBertrand Russell3 sharedDavid Hume3 sharedEdward Zalta3 sharedRené Descartes3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Consciousness & Mind→