Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    David Enoch — Carmelics
    Thinkers/David Enoch
    DE

    David Enoch

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy, Moral Realism

    b. 1972

    David Enoch is a moral philosopher and legal theorist at Hebrew University of Jerusalem, best known for defending robust moral realism — the view that objective, mind-independent moral facts exist and matter. His 2011 book Taking Morality Seriously offers one of the most systematic contemporary defenses of non-naturalist realism, engaging seriously with the epistemological and metaphysical challenges the view faces. He also works in legal philosophy, examining the normative foundations of law and authority.

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Authored Taking Morality Seriously (2011), a landmark defense of robust non-naturalist moral realism

    2

    Developed influential responses to the companions-in-guilt argument linking moral and mathematical ontology

    3

    Advanced the 'why be moral' debate by grounding the normativity of morality in irreducibly normative facts

    4

    Contributed to philosophy of law on the nature of legal authority and its relationship to moral reasons

    5

    Challenged quasi-realist and constructivist metaethical positions through systematic argument

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Consequentialism

    claim

    Wrongness is identical to the property of being a failure to maximize utility

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Wrongness is identical to the property of being a failure to maximize utility

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy, Moral Realism

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Consequentialism1

    Related Thinkers

    Brian Skyrms2 shared
    Patrick Maher
    2 shared
    Plato2 shared
    René Descartes2 shared
    Friedrich Nietzsche2 shared
    Edward Blyden2 shared
    Gideon Rosen2 shared
    James T. Holly2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Consequentialism→