Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Diodorus Chronos — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Diodorus Chronos
    DC

    Diodorus Chronos

    ancientMegarian-Dialectical School

    -340 – -284

    Diodorus Cronus (died c. 284 BCE) was an ancient Greek philosopher of the Megarian-Dialectical school, renowned for his foundational contributions to propositional logic and modal theory. He is best known for the Master Argument (Kyrieuon Logos), which aimed to demonstrate that only what is or will be the case is genuinely possible, collapsing the distinction between possibility and future actuality. His rigorous treatment of conditionals, negation, and temporal modality exercised significant influence on Stoic logic.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Formulated the Master Argument (Kyrieuon Logos) defending logical determinism about future contingents

    2

    Defined possibility as 'what is or will be the case,' grounding modal logic in temporal actuality

    3

    Developed a strict account of the conditional (sunartesis) requiring necessary connection between antecedent and consequent

    4

    Advanced the analysis of motion and time through arguments against infinite divisibility

    5

    Influenced Stoic propositional logic, particularly through his student Philo of Megara

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    Free Will & Foreknowledge

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    ancient

    Tradition

    Megarian-Dialectical School

    Topic Influence

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1
    Modality & Possibility1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedKenny2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedPlato2 sharedAristotle2 sharedIsaac Newton2 sharedPeter van Inwagen2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Free Will & Foreknowledge→See Modality & Possibility→