Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Dov Gabbay — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Dov Gabbay
    DG

    Dov Gabbay

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy / Formal Logic

    b. 1945

    Dov Gabbay (born 1945) is an Israeli logician and philosopher, Professor of Logic at King's College London, renowned for foundational contributions to non-classical logics, temporal logic, and argumentation theory. He developed the theory of labelled deductive systems and has been one of the most prolific authors and editors in formal logic, shaping the discipline through numerous handbooks and monographs. His work spans non-monotonic reasoning, modal logic, and the formal study of defeasible argumentation.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed the theory of labelled deductive systems, a unifying framework for non-classical logics

    2

    Pioneered formal approaches to temporal logic and its applications in computer science and philosophy

    3

    Foundational contributions to non-monotonic and defeasible reasoning

    4

    Co-editor of the landmark Handbook of Philosophical Logic series (multiple volumes)

    5

    Established rigorous formal frameworks for argumentation theory

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    Free Will & Foreknowledge

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy / Formal Logic

    Topic Influence

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1
    Modality & Possibility1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedKenny2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedPlato2 sharedAristotle2 sharedIsaac Newton2 sharedPeter van Inwagen2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Free Will & Foreknowledge→See Modality & Possibility→