Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Fine — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Fine
    F

    Fine

    contemporaryPhilosophy of Science

    b. 1937

    Arthur Fine is an American philosopher of science best known for his Natural Ontological Attitude (NOA), a stance that seeks to dissolve the realism/anti-realism debate. He has made significant contributions to the foundations of quantum mechanics and the philosophy of scientific realism, engaging critically with arguments like the no-miracles argument.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed the Natural Ontological Attitude (NOA) as an alternative to scientific realism and anti-realism

    2

    Proved Fine's theorem relating joint probability distributions to Bell inequalities in quantum mechanics

    3

    Extensive critical analysis of the no-miracles argument and inference to the best explanation

    4

    Influential work on the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument and quantum foundations

    5

    Long-tenured professor at the University of Washington

    Positions & Arguments(4)

    Causation

    premise

    The no-miracles argument rests on the premise that scientific methodology is informed by approximately true background theories

    Truth & Knowledge

    premise

    The no-miracles argument rests on the premise that scientific methodology is informed by approximately true background theories

    premise

    The reliability of inference to the best explanation is precisely what the no-miracles argument is attempting to establish

    premise

    The plausibility of the premise that scientific methodology is informed by approximately true background theories itself relies on an inference to the best explanation

    claim

    The no-miracles argument (that scientific methodology is reliable because it is informed by approximately true background theories) is circular

    Skepticism

    premise

    The reliability of inference to the best explanation is precisely what the no-miracles argument is attempting to establish

    premise

    The plausibility of the premise that scientific methodology is informed by approximately true background theories itself relies on an inference to the best explanation

    claim

    The no-miracles argument (that scientific methodology is reliable because it is informed by approximately true background theories) is circular

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    4

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Philosophy of Science

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge4
    Skepticism3
    Causation1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis3 sharedImmanuel Kant3 sharedAristotle3 sharedBrian Skyrms3 sharedPlato3 sharedPatrick Maher3 sharedRené Descartes3 sharedDavid Hilbert3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→