Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    J.N. Keynes — Carmelics
    Thinkers/J.N. Keynes
    JK

    J.N. Keynes

    modernBritish Empiricism, Formal Logic

    1852 – 1949

    John Neville Keynes (1852–1949) was a British logician and economist, best known for his systematic treatise on formal logic and his methodological contributions to political economy. Father of John Maynard Keynes, he held administrative and academic positions at Cambridge and produced foundational work distinguishing descriptive from normative economics. His logical writings engaged closely with questions of inference, modal reasoning, and the logic of future contingencies.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Authored Studies and Exercises in Formal Logic (1884), a widely used university textbook on classical logic

    2

    Introduced the influential tripartite distinction between positive economics, normative economics, and the art of economics

    3

    Engaged with temporal and modal logic, including formal treatment of future contingent propositions

    4

    Authored The Scope and Method of Political Economy (1891), shaping the methodology of economics as a discipline

    5

    Served as Registrary of the University of Cambridge, contributing to its administrative development

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    Free Will & Foreknowledge

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    modern

    Tradition

    British Empiricism, Formal Logic

    Topic Influence

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1
    Modality & Possibility1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedKenny2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedPlato2 sharedAristotle2 sharedIsaac Newton2 sharedPeter van Inwagen2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Free Will & Foreknowledge→See Modality & Possibility→