Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    John Findlay — Carmelics
    Thinkers/John Findlay
    JF

    John Findlay

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy, British Idealism, Phenomenology

    1903 – 1987

    John Niemeyer Findlay (1903–1987) was a South African-born British philosopher who taught at the Universities of Natal, Otago, King's College London, Yale, and Boston University. He is best known for his 1948 argument that God's existence is logically impossible (later retracted), his influential studies of Hegel and Meinong, and contributions to axiology, phenomenology, and tense logic.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Proposed the 'ontological disproof' of God's existence in 'Can God's Existence Be Disproved?' (1948), later retracting it

    2

    Authored Hegel: A Re-examination (1958), a landmark revival of Hegelian scholarship in the Anglophone world

    3

    Wrote Meinong's Theory of Objects and Values (1933), a foundational study of Alexius Meinong

    4

    Contributed to tense logic and the semantics of future contingents, analyzing the logical status of tensed propositions

    5

    Developed a comprehensive axiology in Values and Intentions (1961) and Axiological Ethics (1970)

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    Free Will & Foreknowledge

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy, British Idealism, Phenomenology

    Topic Influence

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1
    Modality & Possibility1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedKenny2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedPlato2 sharedAristotle2 sharedIsaac Newton2 sharedPeter van Inwagen2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Free Will & Foreknowledge→See Modality & Possibility→