Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Karl Barth — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Karl Barth
    KB

    Karl Barth

    contemporaryNeo-orthodoxy / Dialectical Theology / Reformed Theology

    1886 – 1968

    Karl Barth (1886–1968) was a Swiss Reformed theologian widely regarded as the most significant Protestant theologian of the twentieth century. His magnum opus, the multivolume Church Dogmatics, represents a sweeping neo-orthodox reconstruction of Christian doctrine grounded in Christocentric revelation. He broke decisively with nineteenth-century liberal theology and became a leading voice against the German Christian movement during the Nazi era.

    WWikipediaIEPInternet Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Authored the Church Dogmatics (Kirchliche Dogmatik), one of the most comprehensive works of systematic theology in Christian history

    2

    Co-drafted the Barmen Declaration (1934), the confessional document of the Confessing Church opposing Nazi theological accommodation

    3

    Pioneered dialectical theology with his 1919 commentary on Romans (Der Römerbrief), rejecting liberal Protestant optimism

    4

    Developed a fully Christocentric theological method in which all doctrines—including election, creation, and anthropology—are reframed through Jesus Christ

    5

    Revived Reformed covenant theology and reshaped twentieth-century ecumenical dialogue

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    Free Will & Foreknowledge

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Neo-orthodoxy / Dialectical Theology / Reformed Theology

    Topic Influence

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1
    Modality & Possibility1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedKenny2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedPlato2 sharedAristotle2 sharedIsaac Newton2 sharedPeter van Inwagen2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Free Will & Foreknowledge→See Modality & Possibility→