Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Keith Whittington — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Keith Whittington
    KW

    Keith Whittington

    contemporaryConstitutional Originalism

    Keith Whittington is a contemporary American constitutional theorist and political scientist at Princeton University. He is best known for distinguishing between constitutional interpretation—the judicial task of applying clear textual meaning—and constitutional construction, the political process by which ambiguous constitutional provisions acquire substantive meaning over time. His scholarship integrates legal theory and American political development to examine how constitutional meaning is produced across all branches of government.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed the theory of constitutional construction, distinguishing judicial interpretation from political branch meaning-making

    2

    Articulated an originalist interpretive theory grounded in the abstract intentions of the Founders rather than specific expected applications

    3

    Authored 'Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review' (1999)

    4

    Authored 'Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning' (1999)

    5

    Contributed influential scholarship on judicial review, presidential power, and the political foundations of judicial authority

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Rights & Liberty

    claim

    An interpretive theory that appeals to the abstract intentions of constitutional authors over their concrete historical understandings may not qualify as genuine originalism and may instead collapse into living constitutionalism.

    Democracy & Governance

    claim

    An interpretive theory that appeals to the abstract intentions of constitutional authors over their concrete historical understandings may not qualify as genuine originalism and may instead collapse into living constitutionalism.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Constitutional Originalism

    Topic Influence

    Democracy & Governance1
    Rights & Liberty1

    Related Thinkers

    John Stuart Mill2 sharedEdward Blyden2 sharedJames T. Holly2 sharedJoseph Raz2 sharedMartha Nussbaum2 sharedMartin Delany2 sharedDavid Miller2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Democracy & Governance→See Rights & Liberty→