Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Kripke — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Kripke
    K

    Kripke

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy

    1940 – 2022

    Saul Aaron Kripke (1940–2022) was an American philosopher and logician widely regarded as one of the most important figures in twentieth-century analytic philosophy. He revolutionized modal logic by developing possible-worlds semantics and made foundational contributions to philosophy of language through his theory of rigid designation and direct reference.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed Kripke semantics (possible-worlds semantics) for modal logic, providing the standard model-theoretic framework for necessity and possibility

    2

    Introduced the theory of rigid designators and direct reference in 'Naming and Necessity' (1980), overturning descriptivist theories of meaning

    3

    Distinguished the epistemic (a priori/a posteriori) and metaphysical (necessary/contingent) dimensions of propositions, showing they come apart

    4

    Offered an influential interpretation of Wittgenstein's rule-following paradox in 'Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language' (1982)

    5

    Contributed to formal semantics for intuitionistic logic and the theory of truth (the Kripke fixed-point construction)

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    claim

    The accessibility relation between DRSs is not stipulated but is entailed by the semantics of the DRS language

    Free Will & Foreknowledge

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    Philosophy of Language

    claim

    The accessibility relation between DRSs is not stipulated but is entailed by the semantics of the DRS language

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Modality & Possibility2
    Free Will & Foreknowledge1
    Philosophy of Language1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant3 sharedDavid Lewis3 sharedAristotle3 sharedDavid Hume3 sharedPlato3 sharedLudwig Wittgenstein3 sharedRudolf Carnap3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Modality & Possibility→See Free Will & Foreknowledge→
    Isaac Newton
    3 shared