Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Laudan — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Laudan
    L

    Laudan

    contemporaryPhilosophy of Science

    b. 1941

    Larry Laudan is an American philosopher of science known for his critiques of scientific realism and his development of a problem-solving model of scientific progress. His work on the pessimistic meta-induction and normative naturalism has been deeply influential in debates about the rationality and reliability of science.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed the pessimistic meta-induction argument against scientific realism

    2

    Proposed the problem-solving model of scientific progress in 'Progress and Its Problems' (1977)

    3

    Articulated normative naturalism as a methodology for philosophy of science

    4

    Critiqued the no-miracles argument by challenging the reliability of approximate truth claims

    5

    Advanced the reticulational model relating theories, methods, and aims in science

    Positions & Arguments(4)

    Causation

    premise

    The no-miracles argument rests on the premise that scientific methodology is informed by approximately true background theories

    Truth & Knowledge

    premise

    The no-miracles argument rests on the premise that scientific methodology is informed by approximately true background theories

    premise

    The reliability of inference to the best explanation is precisely what the no-miracles argument is attempting to establish

    premise

    The plausibility of the premise that scientific methodology is informed by approximately true background theories itself relies on an inference to the best explanation

    claim

    The no-miracles argument (that scientific methodology is reliable because it is informed by approximately true background theories) is circular

    Skepticism

    premise

    The reliability of inference to the best explanation is precisely what the no-miracles argument is attempting to establish

    premise

    The plausibility of the premise that scientific methodology is informed by approximately true background theories itself relies on an inference to the best explanation

    claim

    The no-miracles argument (that scientific methodology is reliable because it is informed by approximately true background theories) is circular

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    4

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Philosophy of Science

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge4
    Skepticism3
    Causation1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis3 sharedImmanuel Kant3 sharedAristotle3 sharedBrian Skyrms3 sharedPlato3 sharedPatrick Maher3 sharedRené Descartes3 sharedDavid Hilbert3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Skepticism→