Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Mark Schroeder — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Mark Schroeder
    MS

    Mark Schroeder

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy, Metaethics

    Mark Schroeder is a contemporary American analytic philosopher and professor at the University of Southern California, specializing in metaethics, normative theory, and the philosophy of reasons. He is best known for his influential defense of Humeanism about reasons and his systematic engagement with expressivism and noncognitivist metaethical programs. His work examines the foundations of normativity, including the nature of wrongness, reasons for action, and the semantics of evaluative discourse.

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed an influential Humean theory of reasons in 'Slaves of the Passions' (2007), grounding reasons in desires and the promotion of what agents are for

    2

    Provided a systematic semantic critique of expressivism in 'Being For' (2008), engaging the Frege-Geach problem

    3

    Authored 'Noncognitivism in Ethics' (2010), a rigorous survey and critique of noncognitivist metaethical positions

    4

    Contributed to debates on the relationship between wrongness, reasons, and consequentialist moral theory

    5

    Advanced work on the structure of normative reasons and their role in grounding moral obligations

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Consequentialism

    claim

    Wrongness is identical to the property of being a failure to maximize utility

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Wrongness is identical to the property of being a failure to maximize utility

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy, Metaethics

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Consequentialism1

    Related Thinkers

    Brian Skyrms2 shared
    Patrick Maher
    2 shared
    Plato2 shared
    René Descartes2 shared
    Friedrich Nietzsche2 shared
    Edward Blyden2 shared
    Gideon Rosen2 shared
    James T. Holly2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Consequentialism→