Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Michael Slote — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Michael Slote
    MS

    Michael Slote

    contemporaryMoral Sentimentalism / Care Ethics / Virtue Ethics

    b. 1941

    Michael Slote (born 1941) is an American moral philosopher and UST Professor of Ethics at the University of Miami, known for his work in virtue ethics, care ethics, and moral sentimentalism. He has developed an empathy-based account of morality that draws on Humean sentimentalism and feminist care ethics to ground normative theory in emotional responsiveness rather than reason. His work spans free will, agent-relative ethics, and the moral significance of gender.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed an empathy-based moral sentimentalism as an alternative to rationalist ethical theories

    2

    Advanced care ethics into a systematic philosophical framework in works such as 'The Ethics of Care and Empathy'

    3

    Argued for agent-relative virtue ethics in 'Morals from Motives', challenging consequentialist impartiality

    4

    Contributed to debates on free will by linking them inseparably to metaphysical and ethical commitments

    5

    Integrated feminist concerns about women's opportunities into mainstream analytic moral philosophy

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Moral Responsibility

    claim

    Philosophers speculating about women ought to take into account the obstacles to women's opportunities for subjecthood and choice created by those who constructed an oppressive situation for women.

    Rights & Liberty

    claim

    Philosophers speculating about women ought to take into account the obstacles to women's opportunities for subjecthood and choice created by those who constructed an oppressive situation for women.

    Free Will & Foreknowledge

    claim

    Disputes about free will ineluctably involve disputes about metaphysics and ethics.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Moral Sentimentalism / Care Ethics / Virtue Ethics

    Topic Influence

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1
    Rights & Liberty1
    Moral Responsibility1

    Related Thinkers

    John Stuart Mill3 sharedDavid Hume3 sharedThomas Hobbes3 sharedImmanuel Kant3 sharedGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz3 sharedKenny2 sharedAristotle2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Free Will & Foreknowledge→See Rights & Liberty→
    Martha Nussbaum
    2 shared