Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Michael Smith — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Michael Smith
    MS

    Michael Smith

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy, Metaethics

    b. 1954

    Michael Smith is a prominent contemporary analytic philosopher known for his work in metaethics, moral psychology, and action theory. He is best known for his dispositional theory of normative reasons and his influential book *The Moral Problem*, which defends a cognitivist, realist account of moral judgment while explaining the motivational dimension of moral belief. He has held positions at Princeton University and the Australian National University.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Authored *The Moral Problem* (1994), a landmark work in metaethics defending moral realism with a Humean theory of motivation

    2

    Developed the dispositional theory of normative reasons, grounding reasons in what an ideally rational agent would desire

    3

    Contributed foundational analyses of the relationship between moral judgment, motivation, and rational agency

    4

    Advanced debate on the compatibility of free will with metaphysical and ethical commitments

    5

    Defended a consequentialist account of wrongness in terms of failure to maximize utility

    Positions & Arguments(3)

    Consequentialism

    claim

    Wrongness is identical to the property of being a failure to maximize utility

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Wrongness is identical to the property of being a failure to maximize utility

    claim

    If deflationism is true, then the explanation expressed in (6) goes missing.

    Free Will & Foreknowledge

    claim

    Disputes about free will ineluctably involve disputes about metaphysics and ethics.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    3

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy, Metaethics

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge2
    Consequentialism1
    Free Will & Foreknowledge1

    Related Thinkers

    Plato3 sharedFriedrich Nietzsche3 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedDavid Lewis2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedAristotle2 sharedBrian Skyrms2 sharedPatrick Maher2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Consequentialism→