Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Nino Cocchiarella — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Nino Cocchiarella
    NC

    Nino Cocchiarella

    contemporaryFormal Logic, Analytic Philosophy, Formal Ontology

    b. 1933

    Nino Cocchiarella is a contemporary American logician and philosopher best known for his contributions to formal ontology, tense logic, and second-order predicate logic. He developed a systematic framework of conceptual realism as a foundation for logic and language, and made significant technical contributions to the formal treatment of temporal and modal contexts. He spent much of his career at Indiana University.

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed conceptual realism as a formal ontological framework grounding predication and reference

    2

    Made foundational contributions to tense logic, including analysis of future contingencies and temporal operators

    3

    Extended second-order predicate logic to handle intensional and temporal contexts rigorously

    4

    Authored 'Formal Ontology and Conceptual Realism' (2007), a systematic treatment of logic and ontology

    5

    Distinguished between referential and predicable concepts in a formal theory of universals

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    Free Will & Foreknowledge

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Formal Logic, Analytic Philosophy, Formal Ontology

    Topic Influence

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1
    Modality & Possibility1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 shared
    Immanuel Kant
    2 shared
    Kenny2 shared
    David Hume2 shared
    Plato2 shared
    Aristotle2 shared
    Isaac Newton2 shared
    Peter van Inwagen2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Free Will & Foreknowledge→See Modality & Possibility→