Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Peter Geach — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Peter Geach
    PG

    Peter Geach

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy / Thomism

    1916 – 2013

    Peter Geach (1916–2013) was a British analytic philosopher renowned for his work in philosophical logic, philosophy of language, and metaphysics, with a strong commitment to Thomistic and Aristotelian thought. He made foundational contributions to theories of predication, reference, and identity, while simultaneously engaging with medieval logic and scholastic metaphysics. His marriage to G.E.M. Anscombe placed him at the center of mid-twentieth-century analytic Catholic philosophy.

    WWikipedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed the relative identity thesis, arguing that identity statements are only meaningful relative to a sortal predicate

    2

    Authored Reference and Generality (1962), a major work reconceiving predication and the logic of general terms

    3

    Formulated the Geach–Kaplan sentence, a landmark example demonstrating limits of first-order logic

    4

    Wrote Mental Acts (1957), influencing philosophy of mind by defending an abstractionist account of concept formation

    5

    Revived engagement with medieval Aristotelian-Thomistic logic within the analytic tradition

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    By analogy, simply positing relational tropes does not provide an effective theoretical response to Bradley's argument

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    By analogy, simply positing relational tropes does not provide an effective theoretical response to Bradley's argument

    Divine Attributes

    claim

    Predication with respect to quiddity must be of a composite being.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy / Thomism

    Topic Influence

    Truth & Knowledge1
    Modality & Possibility1
    Divine Attributes1

    Related Thinkers

    Immanuel Kant3 sharedAristotle3 sharedPlato3 sharedThomas Aquinas3 sharedGottlob Frege3 sharedIsaac Newton3 sharedLudwig Wittgenstein3 sharedG.E. Moore3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Truth & Knowledge→See Modality & Possibility→