Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Tarski — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Tarski
    Tarski

    Tarski

    contemporaryMathematical Logic / Analytic Philosophy

    1901 – 1983

    Alfred Tarski (1901–1983) was a Polish-American logician and mathematician widely regarded as one of the greatest logicians of the twentieth century. He made foundational contributions to mathematical logic, model theory, set theory, and formal semantics, most notably through his semantic theory of truth. His work established rigorous frameworks for analyzing the relationship between formal languages and the structures they describe.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford EncyclopediaIEPInternet Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed the semantic (correspondence) theory of truth, defining truth for formal languages via satisfaction relations

    2

    Proved the undefinability theorem: a sufficiently expressive language cannot define its own truth predicate

    3

    Established foundational results in model theory, including the Löwenheim–Skolem–Tarski theorem

    4

    Proved the decidability of elementary algebra and Euclidean geometry

    5

    Co-developed the Banach–Tarski paradox in set theory

    Positions & Arguments(1)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    Free Will & Foreknowledge

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    1

    Topics

    2

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Mathematical Logic / Analytic Philosophy

    Topic Influence

    Free Will & Foreknowledge1
    Modality & Possibility1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis2 sharedImmanuel Kant2 sharedKenny2 sharedDavid Hume2 sharedPlato2 sharedAristotle2 sharedIsaac Newton2 sharedPeter van Inwagen2 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Free Will & Foreknowledge→See Modality & Possibility→