Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    William of Ockham — Carmelics
    Thinkers/William of Ockham
    Wo

    William of Ockham

    medievalScholasticism, Nominalism

    1287 – 1347

    William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347) was an English Franciscan friar and scholastic philosopher whose nominalist metaphysics fundamentally challenged realist assumptions inherited from Aristotle and the Church Fathers. He is best known for the methodological principle 'Ockham's Razor' (parsimony in explanation) and for his rigorous treatment of universals, future contingents, and the limits of papal authority. His work shaped the via moderna and influenced early modern philosophy, Protestant theology, and the development of empiricism.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford EncyclopediaIEPInternet Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Articulated nominalism: denied the real existence of universals, holding only particulars exist

    2

    Formulated Ockham's Razor (lex parsimoniae): entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity

    3

    Developed a sophisticated logic of future contingents, denying bivalence for propositions about undetermined futures

    4

    Challenged papal authority in political theology, defending the poverty ideal against John XXII

    5

    Advanced a voluntarist theology in which God's absolute power (potentia absoluta) is unconstrained by rational necessity

    Positions & Arguments(3)

    Modality & Possibility

    claim

    Both the existence monist and existence nihilist must establish that the premises of the exclusion argument (or any alternative they provide) have sufficient plausibility to override considerations from intuition and perception.

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Both the existence monist and existence nihilist must establish that the premises of the exclusion argument (or any alternative they provide) have sufficient plausibility to override considerations from intuition and perception.

    Free Will & Foreknowledge

    claim

    The second 'broad assumption' (¬p ∧ ¬Fp) → P¬Fp is not true when p refers to a future contingency

    Philosophy of Language

    claim

    Boethius' observations on genus and species may be the historical precursor of the containment principle (Co)

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    3

    Topics

    4

    Era

    medieval

    Tradition

    Scholasticism, Nominalism

    Topic Influence

    Modality & Possibility2
    Truth & Knowledge1
    Free Will & Foreknowledge1
    Philosophy of Language1

    Related Thinkers

    David Lewis4 sharedImmanuel Kant4 sharedAristotle4 sharedDavid Hume4 sharedPlato4 sharedRudolf Carnap4 sharedIsaac Newton4 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Modality & Possibility→See Truth & Knowledge→
    Ludwig Wittgenstein4 shared