Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that All attempts to save meaningful contingency governed by human free will are doomed to failure

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.God's foreknowledge entails the necessity of future events
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.No logical distinction (such as composite/divided sense or conditional/absolute necessity) successfully rescues genuine human freedom from divine determinism
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.God's eternal omniscience entails that every future human act is timelessly determined within the divine intellect before any creaturely deliberation occurs.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Gregory of Rimini demonstrated that Ockham's divided-sense distinction merely relocates necessity rather than eliminating it, since the power to do otherwise remains counterfactually inert under eternal foreknowledge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A freedom that is never actually exercised contrary to what God eternally foreknows is nominally free but functionally indistinguishable from determinism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Molina's middle knowledge presupposes that counterfactuals of creaturely freedom have determinate truth values independent of God's will, yet no coherent non-circular grounding for such truths has been identified.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Without a credible grounding for these counterfactuals, the apparatus of middle knowledge collapses into either Calvinist hard determinism or an unconstrained libertarianism incompatible with God's providential sovereignty.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.