Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    An all-perfect God would not be the cause of error — Carmelics
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Clear and distinct perceptions cannot be in error

    An all-perfect God would not be the cause of error

    Against an attribute of GodDivine Attributes
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine AttributesAgainst an attribute of God

    Connections

    4 topics

    Moral Responsibility3 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Divine Attributes
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Truth & Knowledge
    1 linked
    Free Will & Foreknowledge1 linked
    Skepticism1 linked

    Related

    Clear and distinct perceptions cannot be in errorGod can allow errors that are the perceiver's fault, but not errors that would b...On occasions of clear and distinct perception, assent is involuntary and not the...When assent is the unavoidable consequence of one's God-given cognitive nature, ...

    Similar

    God, being all-perfect, cannot be the cause of error95%The existence of an all-perfect God guarantees the truth of clear and ...76%A faulty and imperfect effect does not warrant inferring a perfect cau...75%God is maximally perfect and cannot possess imperfections.74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: descartes-epistemology
    View source passageHide passage
    Not only is the theodicy used to explain the kinds of error God can allow, it serves to clarify the kinds of error God cannot allow. From the latter arises a proof of the C&D Rule. God can allow errors that are my fault, but not errors that would be God’s fault. On occasions when my perception is clear and distinct, my assent is involuntary and thus not a result of a misuse of my freewill. In such cases, assent is a necessary consequence of my cognitive nature – a point made in many passages

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective