Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    When assent is the unavoidable consequence of one's God-g... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Clear and distinct perceptions cannot be in error

    When assent is the unavoidable consequence of one's God-given cognitive nature, God would be properly blamed if those judgments resulted in error

    Against an attribute of GodMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityAgainst an attribute of God

    Connections

    4 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Free Will & Foreknowledge
    1 linked
    Skepticism1 linked
    Divine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    An all-perfect God would not be the cause of errorClear and distinct perceptions cannot be in errorGod can allow errors that are the perceiver's fault, but not errors that would b...On occasions of clear and distinct perception, assent is involuntary and not the...

    Similar

    On occasions of clear and distinct perception, assent is involuntary a...84%The process leading to assent—inquiry, deliberation, pondering, or div...83%It is a conceptual truth that moral judgments are liable to error beyo...75%A judgment with the same content as the cognitive element of a blaming...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: descartes-epistemology
    View source passageHide passage
    Not only is the theodicy used to explain the kinds of error God can allow, it serves to clarify the kinds of error God cannot allow. From the latter arises a proof of the C&D Rule. God can allow errors that are my fault, but not errors that would be God’s fault. On occasions when my perception is clear and distinct, my assent is involuntary and thus not a result of a misuse of my freewill. In such cases, assent is a necessary consequence of my cognitive nature – a point made in many passages

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective