Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Giving up external possessions to preserve a relationship... — Carmelics
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→One can give up external possessions to maintain a family relationship without sacrificing real goods

    Giving up external possessions to preserve a relationship does not require surrendering modesty or fidelity

    Virtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Virtue Ethics

    Connections

    1 topic

    Justice & Punishment2 linked

    Related

    External possessions are not real goods

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Virtue Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Modesty and fidelity are real goods
    One can give up external possessions to maintain a family relationship without s...

    Similar

    One can give up external possessions to maintain a family relationship...84%Bodily and external goods are not necessary for virtue74%A distinctively personal relationship cannot subordinate concern for t...70%One can recognize that an external thing has no ultimate value and sti...70%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: epictetus
    View source passageHide passage
    Epictetus does not believe that there is any conflict between other-regarding behavior and appropriate self-concern. We are naturally oriented toward our own well-being, but acting for our own sake often entails contributing to the common good (1.19.11-14). More particularly, the preservation of our relationships (scheseis) belongs to our own good, though only insofar as it is possible to preserve them by right behavior. If maintaining a connection to a family member requires giving up external

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective