Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Hadot's interpretation of Marcus's 'erase impressions' as 'assent only to objective physical descriptions' is more existentialist than Stoic.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
For the Stoics, value is objective rather than subjectively added by the perceiving subject.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Marcus repeatedly exults in the beauty and goodness of the cosmos as a whole.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The Stoics recognized evaluative impressions, meaning that impressions themselves can carry evaluative content.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
2 perspectives
Reason against 1 of 2
?
1.
Chrysippus held that all impressions, including evaluative ones, are passively received from external objects with determinate normative content.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Hadot's 'physical descriptions' strip evaluative content before assent, making value a subjective bracketing act foreign to orthodox Stoic epistemology.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Sartrean bad faith, not Stoic discipline, is the framework where meaning is added or withheld by a choosing subject confronting brute facticity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason against 2 of 2
?
1.
Marcus's Meditations 6.13 instructs erasing impressions to achieve tranquility, but Epictetus in Discourses 1.1 grounds this in recognizing objective rational order, not suspending evaluation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Hadot's own intellectual formation in Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty predisposes him to read Stoic exercises as phenomenological reduction rather than cognitive correction of false beliefs about objective value.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.