Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Manipulation of one person by another does not automatically undermine freedom

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Persuasion that bypasses rational agency—exploiting cognitive biases, emotional vulnerabilities, or false beliefs—differs categorically from legitimate rational influence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Frankfurt-style cases show that an agent can be manipulated into having the very second-order volitions they endorse, undermining the self-authorship condition compatibilists like Frankfurt require for freedom.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If manipulated agents cannot distinguish covert rational subversion from genuine deliberation, their subsequent self-blame is evidence of false belief, not genuine freedom.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Derk Pereboom's four-case manipulation argument demonstrates that if a neuroscientist directly programs an agent's reasons-responsive mechanism, compatibilist conditions can be fully satisfied yet the agent is clearly unfree.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If manipulation that satisfies all compatibilist conditions still intuitively undermines responsibility, then satisfying those conditions is insufficient for freedom, and ordinary persuasion cases cannot be used to vindicate compatibilism by analogy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.In real life, people may be manipulated by others through arguments or persuasion to do things they would not otherwise have done
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.This kind of manipulation is not ordinarily thought to rob a person of free will or the ability to act freely in the way required for moral responsibility
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.People believe they could have resisted the manipulative argument or persuasion
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.