Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Public reason cannot decide whether Abraham's act was leg... — Carmelics
    Home/Religious Experience
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Whether Abraham was legitimately obeying God or was a deluded would-be murderer must be decided as a matter of individual religious faith

    Public reason cannot decide whether Abraham's act was legitimate obedience to God or murderous delusion

    Democracy & GovernanceReligious Experience
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Religious ExperienceDemocracy & Governance

    Connections

    1 topic

    Free Will & Foreknowledge2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Religious Experience
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    When public reason cannot resolve a question, individuals must decide for themse...Whether Abraham was legitimately obeying God or was a deluded would-be murderer ...

    Similar

    Whether Abraham was legitimately obeying God or was a deluded would-be...87%Abraham's obedience to God's command cannot be adjudicated by public r...78%Public reason relies on shared communicable norms to decide whether an...78%The contradiction between faith and reason was so deeply rooted in Bay...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: kierkegaard
    View source passageHide passage
    From Kierkegaard’s religious perspective, however, the conceptual distinction between good and evil is ultimately dependent not on social norms but on God. Therefore it is possible, as Johannes de Silentio argues was the case for Abraham (the father of faith), that God demand a suspension of the ethical (in the sense of the socially prescribed norms). This is still ethical in the second sense, since ultimately God’s definition of the distinction between good and evil outranks any human society’s

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective