Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Quota systems requiring preferential hiring of blacks until proportional representation is achieved may be justified as a means of increasing effective opportunities for blacks.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Racial quota systems distribute burdens and benefits based on group membership rather than individual conduct, violating the Kantian principle that persons must be treated as ends in themselves.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Innocent third parties who played no causal role in historical discrimination bear the concrete costs of remediation, making quota systems a form of vicarious punishment incompatible with individual rights.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Nozick's entitlement theory holds that rectification requires tracing injustice to specific violators and victims, not redistributing along demographic lines that dissolve individual moral agency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Thomas Sowell's empirical work shows that group economic disparities routinely predate discriminatory policies or persist identically in groups that faced no legal discrimination, weakening the causal inference in P2.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If proportional representation is not the expected natural outcome of free competition among diverse groups, quotas enforce a statistical baseline that itself lacks principled justification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Targeting proportional representation as the benchmark for corrected opportunity smuggles in an egalitarian outcome metric that the equal opportunity framework was never designed to guarantee.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Whites have historically enjoyed superior social status enforced by law and social custom, including periods of black enslavement.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.As a result of historical advantages, whites on average have greater wealth and education while blacks have less.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Formal equality of opportunity alone does not correct the legacy of structural disadvantage, as most superior positions continue to go to whites even after formal equality is proclaimed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.