Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Brad Hooker — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Brad Hooker
    BH

    Brad Hooker

    contemporaryAnalytic Philosophy, Rule Consequentialism

    b. 1957

    Brad Hooker is a contemporary British moral philosopher best known for his systematic defense of rule consequentialism. He holds a professorship at the University of Reading and has made significant contributions to normative ethics, metaethics, and the theory of moral rules. His work engages both consequentialist foundations and fitting-attitude analyses of moral concepts.

    WWikipediaSEPStanford Encyclopedia

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed a comprehensive defense of rule consequentialism in 'Ideal Code, Real World' (2000)

    2

    Advanced fitting-attitude accounts of moral wrongness and resentment

    3

    Contributed to debates on moral intuitions and their role in ethical theory

    4

    Edited and contributed to foundational anthologies on consequentialism and well-being

    5

    Engaged cross-traditional moral psychology, including Confucian ethics

    Positions & Arguments(2)

    Moral Responsibility

    claim

    Xunzi's criticism of Mencius has force when Mencius is interpreted via the water-metaphor view

    claim

    Wrongness can be explicated in terms of fitting resentment, and resentment can in turn be understood partly in terms of wrongness, supporting a no-priority view for this pair.

    Virtue Ethics

    claim

    Xunzi's criticism of Mencius has force when Mencius is interpreted via the water-metaphor view

    Truth & Knowledge

    claim

    Wrongness can be explicated in terms of fitting resentment, and resentment can in turn be understood partly in terms of wrongness, supporting a no-priority view for this pair.

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    2

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Philosophy, Rule Consequentialism

    Topic Influence

    Moral Responsibility2
    Truth & Knowledge1
    Virtue Ethics1

    Related Thinkers

    Aristotle3 sharedLeibniz3 sharedSulzer3 sharedThomas Hobbes3 sharedFrancis Hutcheson3 sharedGilbert Harman3 sharedEdward Blyden3 sharedJames T. Holly3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Moral Responsibility→See Truth & Knowledge→