Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Reichenbach was not able to recognize the Weyl method as ... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Reichenbach was not able to recognize the Weyl method as other than an equivalent account of empirical determination of the metric

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • Reichenbach reckoned the affine structure of the gravitational-inertial field to be just as conventional as its metrical structure
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Notable Defenders

    Albert Einstein

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    contemporary
    Cited by Cassirer regarding general covariance removing the last remnant of physical objectivity from space and time
    Albert Einsteincontemporary
    Arthur EddingtoncontemporaryEddington's world geometry
    Bertrand RussellcontemporaryRussell 1927: 395; Tarner Lectures at Trinity College, Cambridge, 1926
    Dennis DiekscontemporaryDieks 1987
    Ernst CassirercontemporaryZur Einsteinschen Relativitätstheorie (1921); Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff
    Hans ReichenbachcontemporaryReichenbach 1928: 24 [1958: 15]
    Hans ReichenbachcontemporaryMethod of 'logical analysis' of physical theories
    Klaus HentschelcontemporaryHentschel 1990
    Max Newmancontemporary
    Rudolf CarnapcontemporaryCarnap 1956 [Reichenbach 1958: vii]
    Thomas RyckmancontemporaryRyckman 2005: chapters 7 & 8
    Albert Einsteinmodern
    Albert Einsteinmoderngeneral theory of relativity, 1915
    Albert EinsteinmodernEinstein 1928, 1929, 1932
    Albert Einsteinmoderntheories of relativity; Berlin University seminar on general relativity, winter 1918–1919
    Albert Einsteinmoderntheory of gravitation (general relativity)
    Albert Einsteinmodern1905 analysis of the conventionality of simultaneity in the special theory of relativity
    Albert Einsteinmoderncritic of Weyl's theory
    Albert EinsteinmodernEinstein field equations of general relativity
    Albert Einsteinmodern
    Albert EinsteinmodernEinstein 1905; 1917a [1955: 22]; 1949a: 21
    Albert Einsteinmodern
    Arthur EddingtonmodernEddington 1923
    Arthur Eddingtonmodern
    Arthur EddingtonmodernMeyerson 1925: §150
    Arthur EddingtonmodernSpace, Time and Gravitation (1920); 1936; 1939: 28; 1946
    Arthur HaasmodernHaas 1920
    Arthur Stanley EddingtonmodernEddington 1921
    Bernhard Riemannmodern
    David HilbertmodernHilbert 1915, 1917
    David Hilbertmodern1900 International Congress of Mathematicians, Paris
    David HilbertmodernNaturwissenschaftliche Rundschau 27: 336 (1912)
    E. SellienmodernSellien 1919 (Habilitationsschrift)
    Edmund Husserlmodern
    Edmund Husserlmoderntranscendental phenomenology
    Edmund Husserlmodern
    Ernst CassirermodernSubstanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff (1910)
    Ernst MachmodernMach, Science of Mechanics (1883)
    Felix KleinmodernNaturwissenschaftliche Rundschau 27: 336 (1912)
    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnizmodern
    Gustav Miemodernrelativistic electromagnetic theory of matter
    Hans Reichenbachmodernfirst book (1920), dedicated to Einstein; subsequent books 1924, 1928
    Hans Reichenbachmodern1924 [1969]; 1928 [1958]
    Henri Poincarémodernconventionalism referenced by Schlick (1917)
    Hermann CohenmodernFounder of the Marburg School
    Hermann Minkowskimodern
    Hermann WeylmodernWeyl 1918b, 1919
    Hermann WeylmodernWeyl 1918a,b
    Hermann WeylmodernWeyl 1923a,b
    Hermann WeylmodernWeyl 1920, 1923a, 1929
    Hermann WeylmodernMeyerson 1925: §150
    Hermann Weylmodern
    Hermann Weylmodern1918, Reine Infinitesimalgeometrie
    Ilse SchneidermodernSchneider 1921: 71–75
    Immanuel KantmodernReferenced via Cassirer's reinterpretation of the Transcendental Aesthetic and pure intuition
    Immanuel Kantmodern
    Immanuel Kantmodern
    Immanuel Kantmodern
    Isaac Newtonmodern
    L.E.J. Brouwermodernintuitionist views about the mathematical continuum
    Ludwig Boltzmannmodern
    Max Planckmodern
    Moritz SchlickmodernSpace and Time in Contemporary Physics (1917), Die Naturwissenschaften
    Oliver LodgemodernLodge 1921
    Paul NatorpmodernNatorp 1910: 399–404
    Paul NatorpmodernDie Logischen Grundlagen der Exakten Wissenschaften (1910)
    Rudolf CarnapmodernDer Raum (dissertation, Jena, 1921; monograph 1922)
    Theodore Kaluzamodernvan Dongen 2010: 132–5
    Tullio Levi-CivitamodernLevi-Civita connection
    Émile Meyersonmodern
    Émile MeyersonmodernMeyerson 1925: §150

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Reichenbach reckoned the affine structure of the gravitational-inertial field to...

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: genrel-early
    View source passageHide passage
    Despite the influence of this argument on the subsequent generation of philosophers of science, Reichenbach’s analysis of spacetime measurement is plainly inappropriate, manifesting a fallacious tendency to view the generically curved spacetimes of general relativity as stitched together from little bits of flat Minskowski spacetimes. Besides being mathematically inconsistent, this procedure offers no way of providing a non-metaphorical physical meaning for the fundamental metrical tensor \(g_{\
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit